COMP <GO>
TKLF vs MA // REVENUE GROWTH (YOY)
Tokyo Lifestyle Co. Ltd. (NASDAQ) VS. Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: TKLF 3
— MA 5
▲ REVENUE GROWTH (YOY) LEADER: TKLF
LAST: $1.53 (+8.51%) • MKT CAP: $8.5M
revenue-growth
77.60%
LAST: $635.70 (+4.16%) • MKT CAP: $556.88B
revenue-growth
16.40%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (TKLF VS. MA)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | TKLF | MA | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | 33.50% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | 29.2x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | — | 3.08% | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | 0.90% | 57.60% | -56.70 | MA | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.20% | 45.60% | -45.40 | MA | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) ACTIVE | 77.60% | 16.40% | +61.20 | TKLF | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 6.22% | 0.49% | +5.73 | TKLF | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 11.17 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 2/9 | 8/9 | -6.00 | MA | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 50.7 | 68.8 | -18.10 | MA | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.90 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 10.0x | 31.2x | -21.20 | TKLF | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $8.5M | $556.88B | -$556.87B | MA | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | TKLF REV | MA REV | TKLF GROSS % | MA GROSS % | TKLF FCF | MA FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $373.2M | $32.79B | — | — | -$10.6M | $17.16B |
| FY 2024 | $210.1M | $28.17B | — | — | -$1.6M | $14.31B |
| FY 2023 | $195.7M | $25.10B | — | — | $1.9M | $10.85B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
TKLF // BETA —
MA // BETA 0.90