COMP <GO>
ROMA vs PG // FORWARD P/E MULTIPLE
Roma Green Finance Limited (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: ROMA 0
— PG 9
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $6.62 (-5.43%) • MKT CAP: $394.3M
forward-pe
—
LAST: $160.59 (+1.47%) • MKT CAP: $372.21B
forward-pe
21.7x
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (ROMA VS. PG)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | ROMA | PG | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 17.10% | 51.20% | -34.10 | PG | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | 25.40% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | 16.2x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | -0.65% | 3.77% | -4.42 | PG | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | -60.00% | 24.30% | -84.30 | PG | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | -60.00% | 19.00% | -79.00 | PG | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -22.20% | 0.30% | -22.50 | PG | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 2.65% | -2.65 | PG | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 5.59 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 2/9 | 7/9 | -5.00 | PG | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 40.6 | 60.3 | -19.71 | PG | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.87 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple ACTIVE | — | 21.7x | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $394.3M | $372.21B | -$371.82B | PG | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | ROMA REV | PG REV | ROMA GROSS % | PG GROSS % | ROMA FCF | PG FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $1.2M | $84.28B | 17.1% | 51.2% | -$2.5M | $14.04B |
| FY 2024 | $1.6M | $84.04B | 37.0% | 51.4% | -$1.6M | $16.52B |
| FY 2023 | $1.3M | $82.01B | — | — | -$3.2M | $13.16B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
ROMA // BETA —
PG // BETA 0.87