COMP <GO>
NOA vs TUSK // NET PROFIT MARGIN
North American Construction Group Ltd. (no par) (NYSE) VS. Mammoth Energy Services Inc. (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: NOA 2
— TUSK 0
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $12.54 (-0.95%) • MKT CAP: $347.5M
net-margins
—
LAST: $2.91 (+3.19%) • MKT CAP: $140.1M
net-margins
10.40%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (NOA VS. TUSK)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | NOA | TUSK | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | -29.00% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | — | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | — | — | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | — | -60.00% | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin ACTIVE | — | 10.40% | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -2.90% | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 0.20 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | — | 3/9 | — | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 56.8 | 52.4 | +4.40 | NOA | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | 28.4x | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $347.5M | $140.1M | $207.4M | NOA | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | NOA REV | TUSK REV | NOA GROSS % | TUSK GROSS % | NOA FCF | TUSK FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | — | $44.3M | — | — | — | -$89.1M |
| FY 2024 | — | $45.6M | — | — | — | $179.5M |
| FY 2023 | — | $309.5M | — | — | — | $31.4M |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
NOA // BETA —
TUSK // BETA —