COMP <GO>
LIDR vs PG // FREE CASH FLOW YIELD
AEye Inc. (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: LIDR 1
— PG 9
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $0.99 (-4.87%) • MKT CAP: $48.5M
fcf-yield
—
LAST: $161.57 (+0.61%) • MKT CAP: $372.21B
fcf-yield
3.77%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (LIDR VS. PG)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | LIDR | PG | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -30.00% | 51.20% | -81.20 | PG | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | -35.00% | 25.40% | -60.40 | PG | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | 16.2x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield ACTIVE | — | 3.77% | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | -60.00% | 24.30% | -84.30 | PG | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | -60.00% | 19.00% | -79.00 | PG | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.30% | 0.30% | +15.00 | LIDR | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 2.65% | -2.65 | PG | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 0.20 | 5.59 | -5.39 | PG | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 4/9 | 7/9 | -3.00 | PG | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 50.8 | 60.3 | -9.50 | PG | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.87 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | 21.7x | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $48.5M | $372.21B | -$372.16B | PG | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | LIDR REV | PG REV | LIDR GROSS % | PG GROSS % | LIDR FCF | PG FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $233.0K | $84.28B | -50.0% | 51.2% | -$27.9M | $14.04B |
| FY 2024 | $202.0K | $84.04B | -50.0% | 51.4% | -$27.1M | $16.52B |
| FY 2023 | $1.5M | $82.01B | — | — | -$50.7M | $13.16B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
LIDR // BETA —
PG // BETA 0.87