COMP <GO>
JLHL vs PG // FREE CASH FLOW YIELD
Julong Holding Limited (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: JLHL 0
— PG 10
▲ FREE CASH FLOW YIELD LEADER: PG
LAST: $5.71 (+5.55%) • MKT CAP: $120.1M
fcf-yield
0.03%
LAST: $161.57 (+0.61%) • MKT CAP: $372.21B
fcf-yield
3.77%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (JLHL VS. PG)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | JLHL | PG | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 16.10% | 51.20% | -35.10 | PG | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | 25.40% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | 27.7x | 16.2x | +11.50 | PG | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield ACTIVE | 0.03% | 3.77% | -3.74 | PG | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | 12.20% | 24.30% | -12.10 | PG | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.40% | 19.00% | -8.60 | PG | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 0.30% | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 2.65% | -2.65 | PG | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 5.59 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 3/9 | 7/9 | -4.00 | PG | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 54.0 | 60.3 | -6.30 | PG | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.87 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 30.4x | 21.7x | +8.70 | PG | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $120.1M | $372.21B | -$372.09B | PG | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | JLHL REV | PG REV | JLHL GROSS % | PG GROSS % | JLHL FCF | PG FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $35.4M | $84.28B | 16.1% | 51.2% | $36.5K | $14.04B |
| FY 2024 | — | $84.04B | — | 51.4% | — | $16.52B |
| FY 2023 | — | $82.01B | — | — | — | $13.16B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
JLHL // BETA —
PG // BETA 0.87