COMP <GO>
ITG vs RNTZ // REVENUE GROWTH (YOY)
ITG Inc. (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. Rantizo (Class A) (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: ITG 2
— RNTZ 0
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $5.68 (+20.59%) • MKT CAP: $705.2M
revenue-growth
—
LAST: $4.16 (+2.21%) • MKT CAP: $247.8M
revenue-growth
16.60%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (ITG VS. RNTZ)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | ITG | RNTZ | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | 25.10% | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | -16.20% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | — | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | — | -2.28% | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.60% | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | — | -22.60% | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) ACTIVE | — | 16.60% | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 5.99 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | — | 3/9 | — | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 40.6 | 38.5 | +2.05 | ITG | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | — | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $705.2M | $247.8M | $457.4M | ITG | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | ITG REV | RNTZ REV | ITG GROSS % | RNTZ GROSS % | ITG FCF | RNTZ FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $0 | $12.9M | — | 25.1% | — | -$5.6M |
| FY 2024 | — | $11.1M | — | 36.2% | — | -$4.5M |
| FY 2023 | — | $9.7M | — | — | — | $194.0K |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
ITG // BETA —
RNTZ // BETA —