COMP <GO>
GTIM vs PG // GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
Good Times Restaurants Inc. (NASDAQ) VS. Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: GTIM 2
— PG 6
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $1.29 (0.00%) • MKT CAP: $13.6M
gross-margins
—
LAST: $160.59 (+1.47%) • MKT CAP: $372.21B
gross-margins
51.20%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (GTIM VS. PG)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | GTIM | PG | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin ACTIVE | — | 51.20% | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 0.70% | 25.40% | -24.70 | PG | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | 5.3x | 16.2x | -10.90 | GTIM | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | -10.68% | 3.77% | -14.45 | PG | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.30% | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | — | 19.00% | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 0.30% | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 2.65% | -2.65 | PG | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 5.59 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 4/9 | 7/9 | -3.00 | PG | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 25.1 | 60.3 | -35.24 | PG | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.87 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 12.4x | 21.7x | -9.30 | GTIM | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $13.6M | $372.21B | -$372.20B | PG | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | GTIM REV | PG REV | GTIM GROSS % | PG GROSS % | GTIM FCF | PG FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $0 | $84.28B | — | 51.2% | -$1.5M | $14.04B |
| FY 2024 | $142.3M | $84.04B | — | 51.4% | $2.0M | $16.52B |
| FY 2023 | $138.2M | $82.01B | — | — | $8.0M | $13.16B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
GTIM // BETA —
PG // BETA 0.87