COMP <GO>
FKWL vs DUK // EV/EBITDA & P/E VALUATION
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ) VS. Duke Energy Corporation (Holding Company) (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: FKWL 4
— DUK 6
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $2.19 (0.00%) • MKT CAP: $25.8M
valuation
—
LAST: $125.90 (+1.89%) • MKT CAP: $98.16B
valuation
8.7x
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (FKWL VS. DUK)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | FKWL | DUK | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 17.20% | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | -6.40% | 5.20% | -11.60 | DUK | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation ACTIVE | — | 8.7x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 7.02% | -1.73% | +8.75 | FKWL | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | -6.20% | 31.40% | -37.60 | DUK | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.50% | 18.10% | -18.60 | DUK | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 49.60% | 3.30% | +46.30 | FKWL | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 3.40% | -3.40 | DUK | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 3.17 | 0.89 | +2.28 | FKWL | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 6/9 | 5/9 | +1.00 | FKWL | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 37.9 | 63.8 | -25.94 | DUK | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.76 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | 18.4x | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $25.8M | $98.16B | -$98.14B | DUK | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | FKWL REV | DUK REV | FKWL GROSS % | DUK GROSS % | FKWL FCF | DUK FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $46.1M | $0 | 17.2% | — | $1.8M | -$1.69B |
| FY 2024 | $30.8M | $0 | 11.4% | — | -$828.4K | $48.0M |
| FY 2023 | $45.9M | $0 | — | — | -$1.9M | $9.88B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
FKWL // BETA —
DUK // BETA 0.76