COMP <GO>
DIN vs MA // EV/EBITDA & P/E VALUATION
Dine Brands Global Inc. (NYSE) VS. Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: DIN 4
— MA 4
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $35.16 (+1.38%) • MKT CAP: $445.1M
valuation
—
LAST: $635.70 (+4.16%) • MKT CAP: $556.88B
valuation
29.2x
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (DIN VS. MA)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | DIN | MA | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 40.90% | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | 33.50% | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation ACTIVE | — | 29.2x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 12.00% | 3.08% | +8.92 | DIN | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | — | 57.60% | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.90% | 45.60% | -43.70 | MA | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.20% | 16.40% | -8.20 | MA | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 6.96% | 0.49% | +6.47 | DIN | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 11.17 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 6/9 | 8/9 | -2.00 | MA | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 70.1 | 68.8 | +1.27 | DIN | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | 0.90 | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 24.2x | 31.2x | -7.00 | DIN | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $445.1M | $556.88B | -$556.43B | MA | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | DIN REV | MA REV | DIN GROSS % | MA GROSS % | DIN FCF | MA FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $879.3M | $32.79B | 40.9% | — | $53.4M | $17.16B |
| FY 2024 | $812.3M | $28.17B | 46.2% | — | $94.1M | $14.31B |
| FY 2023 | $831.1M | $25.10B | — | — | $131.1M | $10.85B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
DIN // BETA —
MA // BETA 0.90