COMP <GO>
CUB vs TWIN // OPTIONS IMPLIED MOVE & PUT/CALL SKEW
Lionheart Holdings (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. Twin Disc Incorporated (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: CUB 1
— TWIN 5
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $10.94 (+0.09%) • MKT CAP: $347.5M
options-implied-move
—
LAST: $25.29 (-0.71%) • MKT CAP: $367.7M
options-implied-move
—
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (CUB VS. TWIN)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | CUB | TWIN | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | 27.60% | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | -4.00% | 3.90% | -7.90 | TWIN | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | — | 17.1x | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | -0.17% | 2.40% | -2.57 | TWIN | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.30% | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | — | -0.60% | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 15.50% | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.62% | -0.62 | TWIN | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | 3.13 | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 2/9 | 7/9 | -5.00 | TWIN | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew ACTIVE | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 60.3 | 41.5 | +18.85 | CUB | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 36.1x | — | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $347.5M | $367.7M | -$20.1M | TWIN | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | CUB REV | TWIN REV | CUB GROSS % | TWIN GROSS % | CUB FCF | TWIN FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $0 | $340.7M | — | 27.6% | -$585.5K | $8.8M |
| FY 2024 | $0 | $295.1M | — | 28.2% | — | $25.0M |
| FY 2023 | — | $0 | — | — | — | $22.9M |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
CUB // BETA —
TWIN // BETA —