COMP <GO>
AS vs LULU // OPERATING MARGIN
Amer Sports Inc. (NYSE) VS. lululemon athletica inc. (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: AS 3
— LULU 8
▲ OPERATING MARGIN LEADER: LULU
LAST: $30.67 (+4.21%) • MKT CAP: $16.41B
operating-margins
13.90%
LAST: $107.83 (+0.55%) • MKT CAP: $11.32B
operating-margins
19.90%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (AS VS. LULU)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | AS | LULU | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | 56.60% | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 9.90% | 32.30% | -22.40 | LULU | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | 21.0x | 4.3x | +16.70 | LULU | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 2.21% | 7.95% | -5.74 | LULU | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin ACTIVE | 13.90% | 19.90% | -6.00 | LULU | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.90% | 14.20% | -3.30 | LULU | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.30% | 4.90% | +9.40 | AS | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 3.74 | 5.25 | -1.51 | LULU | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 8/9 | 8/9 | 0.00 | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 55.2 | 57.1 | -1.90 | LULU | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | 1.08 | 0.92 | +0.16 | AS | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 27.6x | 6.8x | +20.80 | LULU | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $16.41B | $11.32B | $5.09B | AS | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | AS REV | LULU REV | AS GROSS % | LULU GROSS % | AS FCF | LULU FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | — | $11.10B | — | 56.6% | — | $921.7M |
| FY 2024 | — | $10.59B | — | 59.2% | — | $1.58B |
| FY 2023 | — | $9.62B | — | — | — | $1.86B |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
AS // BETA 1.08
LULU // BETA 0.92