COMP <GO>
NINE vs TUSK // EV/EBITDA & P/E VALUATION
Nine Energy Service Inc. (NYSE) VS. Mammoth Energy Services Inc. (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: NINE 3
— TUSK 4
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $7.86 (-3.44%) • MKT CAP: $109.6M
valuation
27.2x
LAST: $2.91 (+3.19%) • MKT CAP: $140.1M
valuation
—
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (NINE VS. TUSK)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | NINE | TUSK | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 0.90% | -29.00% | +29.90 | NINE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation ACTIVE | 27.2x | — | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | -21.21% | — | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | 0.40% | -60.00% | +60.40 | NINE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | -9.10% | 10.40% | -19.50 | TUSK | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.40% | -2.90% | +4.30 | NINE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 2/9 | 3/9 | -1.00 | TUSK | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 42.3 | 69.1 | -26.84 | TUSK | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | 28.4x | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $109.6M | $140.1M | -$30.4M | TUSK | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | NINE REV | TUSK REV | NINE GROSS % | TUSK GROSS % | NINE FCF | TUSK FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $561.9M | $44.3M | — | — | -$23.3M | -$89.1M |
| FY 2024 | $554.1M | $45.6M | — | — | -$1.6M | $179.5M |
| FY 2023 | $609.5M | $309.5M | — | — | $45.5M | $31.4M |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
NINE // BETA —
TUSK // BETA —