COMP <GO>
LSE vs GOW // EV/EBITDA & P/E VALUATION
Leishen Energy Holding Co. Ltd. (Class A) (NASDAQ) VS. GOWell Energy Technology (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: LSE 1
— GOW 1
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $4.55 (+2.94%) • MKT CAP: $77.5M
valuation
—
LAST: $3.10 (+2.99%) • MKT CAP: $144.9M
valuation
—
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (LSE VS. GOW)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | LSE | GOW | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 17.60% | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | — | — | — | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation ACTIVE | — | — | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | -4.77% | — | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | -3.40% | — | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.60% | — | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -30.00% | — | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | — | — | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 1/9 | — | — | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 39.8 | 36.3 | +3.52 | LSE | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 57.5x | — | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $77.5M | $144.9M | -$67.4M | GOW | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | LSE REV | GOW REV | LSE GROSS % | GOW GROSS % | LSE FCF | GOW FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $48.3M | — | 17.6% | — | -$3.7M | — |
| FY 2024 | $69.1M | — | 23.2% | — | $14.4M | — |
| FY 2023 | $73.1M | — | — | — | $4.4M | — |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
LSE // BETA —
GOW // BETA —