COMP <GO>
CDIO vs QCLS // EV/EBITDA & P/E VALUATION
Cardio Diagnostics Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ) VS. Q/C Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ) • 15-METRIC TALLY: CDIO 2
— QCLS 0
■ METRIC PARITY
LAST: $1.75 (+2.94%) • MKT CAP: $5.2M
valuation
—
LAST: $0.44 (-3.44%) • MKT CAP: $3.6M
valuation
—
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (CDIO VS. QCLS)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | CDIO | QCLS | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | — | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | -35.00% | -35.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation ACTIVE | — | — | — | TIE | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | — | — | — | TIE | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin | -60.00% | — | — | TIE | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | -60.00% | — | — | TIE | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -57.50% | — | — | TIE | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 0.20 | — | — | TIE | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 3/9 | 3/9 | 0.00 | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 41.0 | 27.9 | +13.12 | CDIO | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | — | — | — | TIE | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | — | — | — | TIE | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $5.2M | $3.6M | $1.6M | CDIO | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | CDIO REV | QCLS REV | CDIO GROSS % | QCLS GROSS % | CDIO FCF | QCLS FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $14.8K | $0 | — | — | -$5.9M | -$9.1M |
| FY 2024 | $34.9K | $0 | — | — | -$5.2M | -$9.0M |
| FY 2023 | $17.1K | $0 | — | — | -$5.7M | -$13.0M |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
CDIO // BETA —
QCLS // BETA —