PagerDuty Inc. (PD) Dividend Safety Gauge & 10-Year DRIP Compounder

Per the Roarable RQD rating, PD scores 64 out of 100, a C grade labeled "Roarable Hold — Fair / Balanced Risk-Reward." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 6/20 (ROIC 6.8%; FCF yield 8.19%), Whale 13F Flow at 17/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 17/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 12/20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 12/20 (Altman Z 1.43; Piotroski F 7/9; Debt/Equity 0.5). The weakest pillar is the cash engine, where a 6.8% ROIC and 1.2% operating margin contrast with an 8.19% FCF yield, suggesting cash generation is running ahead of reported operating profit. The strongest pillars are institutional and insider flow, which the rating treats as supportive signals. For a prospective investor, the upside case rests on the flow pillars and the cash yield, while the valuation tradeoff is that a 7.9x trailing P/E and 7.3x forward P/E sit alongside a thin operating margin, so earnings quality and sustainability are the key items to test. The middling Altman Z and balance-sheet score mean financial risk is moderate rather than acute.

PagerDuty Inc. is a NYSE-listed issuer in the Technology sector, within the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry, per the SEC financials profile. The source data does not describe its specific products, customers, or revenue model. The profile identifies the company only by sector, industry, and exchange. The financial figures indicate revenue of $492.5M for FY 2025, but the composition of that revenue is not detailed in the source data.

Per the SEC financials, revenue grew from $430.7M in FY 2023 to $492.5M in FY 2025, and operating income moved from a loss of $-96.2M to a profit of $5.8M. FY 2025 net income of $172.7M materially exceeds operating income, a gap the source data does not explain. Per the market data, gross margin is 84.9%, operating margin 1.2%, and net margin 35.1%, with ROIC at 6.8%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Forensic Balance Sheet pillar cites an Altman Z-Score of 1.43 and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.5. The balance sheet posture is therefore assessed as moderate by the rating.

The news feed contains six items, all referencing PD, from sources including Yahoo! Finance Canada, Kavout, Yahoo Finance UK, Simply Wall St, TradingView, and GuruFocus. Two items are flagged as catalysts (Simply Wall St, which references "Its Earnings Beat And Customer Growth," and GuruFocus, which references a "3.3% Gain" and a GF Value of $21.48 versus a price of $16.69). The remaining four are flagged as market wire with yellow signals and are general stock-information pages. Per the feed, the GuruFocus item cites a gross valuation reference of $21.48, which the source data presents as a third-party estimate. The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph reports no supply-chain links and no proprietary signals, so there are no butterfly-linked catalysts to report.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as "NONE," with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. The source data therefore does not establish any upstream or downstream dependencies, sector correlations beyond the Technology/Prepackaged Software classification, or second-order bottlenecks. The Roarable RQD macro pillar notes sector sensitivity through a Beta of 1.0, which indicates market-level rather than sub-sector exposure. An investor should note that the absence of mapped links means the source cannot identify which customers, suppliers, or competitors could transmit shocks to PD.

• What drives the gap between FY 2025 net income of $172.7M and operating income of $5.8M, and how much of net income is recurring?
• What are the company's total debt and EPS figures, which the financial records list as N/A?
• What is the EV/EBITDA and what is the cash position trend beyond FY 2025, given FY 2023 cash is listed as N/A?
• What specific products and customer base generate the revenue, which the source data does not describe?
• Who are the institutional and insider holders behind the whale and insider pillar scores, since the holders section is empty?