The market could use a few victories in the days ahead, which will be filled with more earnings, an election, and jobs data.
Why FINS Stock advanced +1.10% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (FINS) carries a Roarable Rating of C- (Hold) with 60/100 RQD Confidence. The composite score sits in the neutral Hold band (59–69), meaning current holders don’t need to panic-sell while prospective buyers can wait for a move into the 70+ Buy zone.
Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) — not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer
FRED Regime × Technicals: 17% of 52W Range • RSI-14 at 47.3 (NEUTRAL RANGE)
Altman Z-Score 3.80 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) • Piotroski F-Score 7/9
Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares) & executive Form 4 sales trim 11 pts from alignment
⚔️ Adversarial Opposing Case: Why the FINS Bull Thesis Could Fail
Even with a 60/100 (C-) score, FINS faces multiple-compression risk if current valuation multiples re-rate toward historical sector medians or if hyperscaler/enterprise customer concentration slows in upcoming 10-Q filings.
Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately.
Dilution & Margin Drag: Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares) — any gross margin slip below 49.5% triggers an automatic RQD downgrade.
Technical & Forensic Kill-Switch: A daily close below the 50D SMA ($12.15) or 200D SMA ($12.66) invalidates the momentum regime and cuts Target Base ($12.04) toward Bear Floor ($9.39).
Why FINS Stock advanced +1.10% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (FINS) advanced +1.10% to $11.93, trading at 17% of its 52-week range ($11.61 – $13.45). Solid steady margins (steady margins), mixed timing at current multiples—hold if owned, no rush to chase.
- ▸Technical Tape: Trading at 17% of its 52-week range ($11.61 – $13.45) with RSI-14 at 47.3 (NEUTRAL RANGE).
- ▸Volatility Profile: Historical 20-day realized swing band of ±3.1% around $11.93 (no active unusual options sweep snapshot on file).
- ▸Fundamental Anchor: Roarable C- (Hold) backed by 52% gross margin and $8.4M annual free cash flow.
Haley Stevens had lost the Democratic nomination for Senate in Michigan to Abdul El-Sayed earlier this year.
Israeli strikes kill eight people in Gaza - medics say Reuters
Russia's FSB says minor detained over park attack threat after US tip-off Reuters
Iran, Qatari mediators hold third day of talks to end US-Iran war Reuters
Qatar surges, bucking Gulf market slide on Iran war concerns Reuters
OPEC+ keeps December oil output targets steady ahead of tougher call for 2027 Reuters
German ministers pledge tough action after rioters damage stores in Frankfurt Reuters
Scheduled RQD Strong Buys & Whale Accumulation Briefing (FINS Tape Review)
- ✓Breakdown of the highest-scoring RQD Green-Light breakouts across our 5,200+ rated universe
- ✓Forensic Red-Light accounting & dilution traps to review on your watchlist
- ✓Includes downloadable .ics calendar invite & nightly RQD rating-change email alerts
FINS Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure
Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).
vs. +6.0% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).
No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on FINS today. View full Setup Ledger →
No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for FINS. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.
📊 Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (FINS)
1. Head-to-Head Financials Peer Comparison (FINS vs. RFMZ, CION, TCPC, ACV)
Industry: Finance/Investors Services (37 Tracked Issuers)Across 1096 tracked Financials securities in the Roarable RQD universe, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (FINS) ranks #517 by composite RQD confidence (60/100, grade C-) and #808 by equity capitalization ($299.0M). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, FINS leads on earnings valuation at N/A trailing P/E, while CION leads on capital efficiency and profitability with -2.9% ROIC and — gross margin. FINS currently leads its immediate peer cohort in composite quantitative strength at 60/100 (C-).
| Ticker / Company | Roarable Grade | RQD Score | Trailing P/E | Gross Margin | ROIC | 1D Change | Market Cap | Head-to-Head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINS
ACTIVE
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of | C- | 60/100 | — | — | — | +1.10% | $299.0M | Benchmark Subject |
| RFMZ RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc. | D | 51/100 | — | — | — | +0.92% | $295.4M | /rfmz-vs-fins → |
| CION CION Investment Corporation | D+ | 57/100 | — | — | -2.9% | +4.56% | $349.8M | /cion-vs-fins → |
| TCPC BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. | D | 48/100 | — | — | -14.9% | +1.69% | $354.1M | /tcpc-vs-fins → |
| ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund of | D+ | 56/100 | — | — | — | +0.13% | $249.7M | /acv-vs-fins → |
2. FINS Fundamental Profitability, Capital Efficiency & Balance-Sheet Forensics
TRAILING 12M & FORWARD QUANTITATIVE SNAPSHOTAngel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (FINS) operates in Finance/Investors Services (Financials) with an equity capitalization of $299.0M, trailing P/E of N/A, forward P/E of N/A, and EV/EBITDA of N/A. Operating profitability registers a gross margin of —, operating margin of —, net profit margin of —, ROIC of —, and free cash flow yield of —, alongside an Altman Z-Score of N/A and Piotroski F-Score of N/A.
3. FINS Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)
✓ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLEDIs FINS stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
As of 2026-11-01, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (NYSE: FINS) is rated C- (Hold / HOLD) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 60/100 at a spot price of $11.93 (+1.10% 1D, market cap $299.0M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 11/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 12/20, Executive Insider Alignment 13/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 15/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 9/20. Across 1096 tracked Financials issuers, FINS ranks #517 in composite RQD confidence.
How does FINS compare to RFMZ and CION in the Financials sector?
Within the Financials sector (Finance/Investors Services), FINS carries a Roarable C- (60/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of —, and ROIC of —. By comparison, RFMZ (RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc.) holds a D grade (51/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC —, cap $295.4M) and CION (CION Investment Corporation) posts a D+ grade (57/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -2.9%, cap $349.8M). Among the 5-stock peer group, FINS leads on earnings multiple (N/A) while CION leads on capital efficiency (-2.9% ROIC).
What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for FINS?
For Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust of (FINS), key quantitative strengths include Established market leader in Financials with deep daily trading liquidity. and sector rank #517 in Financials, while primary risk factors center on Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately. and implied 5-year growth hurdle of 8.0%/yr. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.
Where is FINS trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?
FINS last traded at $11.93 (+1.10% on volume of 49,312 shares), positioning the stock -1.81% below its 50-day simple moving average ($12.15) and -5.77% below its 200-day simple moving average ($12.66). Across its 52-week range of $11.61 to $13.45, FINS sits at the 17.4% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 47.3 (NEUTRAL RANGE) and an implied next-earnings move of ±3.1% ($11.56 to $12.30).
FINS Investor FAQ & Complete 8-Part Research Index
100% OPEN ACCESS • SEC EDGAR × CBOE × FREDWhy is FINS stock moving today?
Why FINS Stock advanced +1.10% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash. Solid steady margins (steady margins), mixed timing at current multiples—hold if owned, no rush to chase.