The Marygold Companies Inc. (MGLD) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, MGLD scores 29 out of 100, earning a letter grade of E and the verdict label "Roarable Strong Sell — Forensic Risk / Avoid." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 4/20 (ROIC -29.1%; FCF yield -4.01%), Whale 13F Flow at 8/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 3/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 6/20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 8/20 (Altman Z 2.5; Piotroski F 2/9; Debt/Equity 0.5). The weakest pillars are Insider Conviction and Fundamental Cash Engine, both of which sit at the low end of their ranges, indicating that the cash-generation and insider-signal components are where the rating is most constrained. For a prospective investor, the practical implication is that the rating frames the stock as carrying substantial forensic and cash-flow risk; upside drivers would need to come from a reversal in returns on capital and free cash flow, which the source data does not show in its most recent period. Valuation tradeoffs cannot be fully assessed because P/E, forward P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EPS are not available in source data. This section is analytical and educational and does not constitute personalized financial advice.

Per the profile, The Marygold Companies Inc. (MGLD) is a NYSE-listed issuer in the Financials sector, operating in the Finance: Consumer Services industry. The source data does not describe the company's products, customers, or revenue model beyond this classification. The reported revenue figures in the SEC financials indicate a business generating tens of millions of dollars annually, but the source data does not specify how that revenue is earned. Sector and industry classification are the only business descriptors available in source data.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $34.9M in FY 2023 to $32.8M in FY 2024 and $23.4M in FY 2025, while operating income moved from $1.4M to losses of $-6.3M and $-6.8M. Operating margin is -29.2% and net margin is -24.8% per the market data, and ROIC is -29.1%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.5 and the Piotroski F-Score is 2/9, with Debt/Equity at 0.5. Cash declined from $5.7M to $4.1M across the two most recent periods reported.

Per the recent news feed, six items reference MGLD, all tagged with a YELLOW light and MARKET WIRE impact label, published within roughly the prior 15 hours of the data timestamp. The headlines are generic market-data or stock-forum pages (a Stock Titan stock-price page, a Moomoo forum item that references a different ticker in its headline, Yahoo Finance and Investing.com seasonal-chart and account-statement pages that reference other instruments), and none describes a company-specific corporate event such as earnings, guidance, contracts, or management changes. The risk-watch item is therefore the absence of identifiable fundamental catalysts in the feed. The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph reports a sector of Financials, a supply chain value of NONE, zero butterfly links, and zero proprietary signals.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. The source data therefore provides no upstream or downstream dependency mapping, no sector correlation figures beyond the Beta of 1.0, and no identified 2nd-order bottlenecks. Investors should note that the absence of mapped links is a data limitation rather than evidence of an absence of dependencies.

• What are the company's products, customers, and principal revenue sources, given that the source data provides only sector and industry classification?
• What explains the decline in revenue from $34.9M to $23.4M and the shift from operating income to operating losses?
• What are the company's debt levels in absolute terms, since the Debt field is reported as N/A for each period?
• Why are EPS, P/E, and EV/EBITDA unavailable, and what would earnings-based valuation show?
• Does the cash balance of $4.1M cover the reported free cash flow deficit of $-3.4M, and what is the funding plan?